budget car insurance

Cost of War


Image by elycefeliz
costofwar.com/

Recent wars, however, have not been provoked by economic factors for the most part. A study by Lewis F. Richardson suggests that the majority of the wars from 1850 to 1950 were related either to religious ideology or to national pride rather than to economic or security issues.
from Prisoners of Hate by Aaron T. Beck

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/07/…

The Iraq adventure has seriously weakened the U.S. economy . . .

Senior Bush administration aides certainly pooh-poohed worrisome estimates in the run-up to the war. Former White House economic adviser Lawrence Lindsey reckoned that the conflict would cost 0 billion to 0 billion; Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld later called his estimate "baloney." Administration officials insisted that the costs would be more like billion to billion. In April 2003, Andrew S. Natsios, the thoughtful head of the U.S. Agency for International Development, said on "Nightline" that reconstructing Iraq would cost the American taxpayer just .7 billion. Ted Koppel, in disbelief, pressed Natsios on the question, but Natsios stuck to his guns. Others in the administration, such as Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, hoped that U.S. partners would chip in, as they had in the 1991 Persian Gulf War, or that Iraq’s oil would pay for the damages.

The end result of all this wishful thinking? As we approach the fifth anniversary of the invasion, Iraq is not only the second longest war in U.S. history (after Vietnam), it is also the second most costly — surpassed only by World War II.

. . . The administration talks only about the upfront costs, which are mostly handled by emergency appropriations. (Iraq funding is apparently still an emergency five years after the war began.) These costs, by our calculations, are now running at billion a month — billion if you include Afghanistan. By the time you add in the costs hidden in the defense budget, the money we’ll have to spend to help future veterans, and money to refurbish a military whose equipment and materiel have been greatly depleted, the total tab to the federal government will almost surely exceed .5 trillion.

But the costs to our society and economy are far greater. When a young soldier is killed in Iraq or Afghanistan, his or her family will receive a U.S. government check for just 0,000 (combining life insurance with a "death gratuity") — far less than the typical amount paid by insurance companies for the death of a young person in a car accident. The stark "budgetary cost" of 0,000 is clearly only a fraction of the total cost society pays for the loss of life — and no one can ever really compensate the families. Moreover, disability pay seldom provides adequate compensation for wounded troops or their families. Indeed, in one out of five cases of seriously injured soldiers, someone in their family has to give up a job to take care of them.

President Bush tried to sell the American people on the idea that we could have a war with little or no economic sacrifice. Even after the United States went to war, Bush and Congress cut taxes, especially on the rich — even though the United States already had a massive deficit. So the war had to be funded by more borrowing. By the end of the Bush administration, the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, plus the cumulative interest on the increased borrowing used to fund them, will have added about trillion to the national debt.

The long-term burden of paying for the conflicts will curtail the country’s ability to tackle other urgent problems, no matter who wins the presidency in November. Our vast and growing indebtedness inevitably makes it harder to afford new health-care plans, make large-scale repairs to crumbling roads and bridges, or build better-equipped schools. Already, the escalating cost of the wars has crowded out spending on virtually all other discretionary federal programs, including the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, and federal aid to states and cities, all of which have been scaled back significantly since the invasion of Iraq.

Think what a difference trillion could make for so many of the United States’ — or the world’s — problems. We could have had a Marshall Plan to help desperately poor countries, winning the hearts and maybe the minds of Muslim nations now gripped by anti-Americanism. In a world with millions of illiterate children, we could have achieved literacy for all — for less than the price of a month’s combat in Iraq. We worry about China’s growing influence in Africa, but the upfront cost of a month of fighting in Iraq would pay for more than doubling our annual current aid spending on Africa.

Closer to home, we could have funded countless schools to give children locked in the underclass a shot at decent lives. Or we could have tackled the massive problem of Social Security, which Bush began his second term hoping to address; for far, far less than the cost of the war, we could have ensured the solvency of Social Security for the next half a century or more.

Economists used to think that wars were good for the economy, a notion born out of memories of how the massive spending of World War II helped bring the United States and the world out of the Great Depression. But we now know far better ways to stimulate an economy — ways that quickly improve citizens’ well-being and lay the foundations for future growth. But money spent paying Nepalese workers in Iraq (or even Iraqi ones) doesn’t stimulate the U.S. economy the way that money spent at home would — and it certainly doesn’t provide the basis for long-term growth the way investments in research, education or infrastructure would.

edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/01/30/iraq.audit/

Nearly billion of money spent on Iraqi reconstruction is unaccounted for because of inefficiencies and bad management, according to an inspector general’s report .

Billionaire Living Out of Tote Bag Amasses Fortune to Give Away
It acquired UK insurance provider Pearl Group Plc — now called Phoenix Group Holdings (PGH) — for $ 1.45 billion in September 2009. Finally, they founded Justice Holdings Ltd., which raised $ 1.44 billion — another record amount — on the London Stock …
Read more on Bloomberg

Death, Taxes, and Senate Bill 1: Texas Legislative Restaurant Update
Uncle Sam: “Hey, we're having a little budget problem and we're going to collect your next month's taxes out of your next paycheck.” You: “But I might not have a job next month, and this month I have a mortgage that needs to be paid, utilities, car …
Read more on D Magazine

Looking Auto Body In Salt Lake City
Do not consider that having a car repair is expensive right away. The level of damage severity is the main determinant. To decrease your expenses, better discuss your plans with insurance company. Here your coverage policy may cover up the repair …
Read more on Eva-News (press release)

{ 0 comments }